To Know

The fact that Genesis 4 opens up with “Adam KNEW his wife” is striking. Yes, this is the Hebrew way of saying sex, but the wording suggests that immediately prior to this chapter, Adam did not know Eve. Not really.

We read that “their eyes were open” in Genesis 3, but perhaps “seeing” does not mean “knowing.” It requires something more.

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.”
Genesis 4:1 (NKJV)

Forgiveness is Greater than Vengeance

When Jesus tells Peter to forgive 70 times 7 (or 77, depending on translation), He is countering the vengeance in the story of Cain and Lamech.

Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?
Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.
Matthew 18:21-22 (NIV)

Lamech said to his wives,

“Adah and Zillah, listen to me;
wives of Lamech, hear my words.
I have killed a man for wounding me,
a young man for injuring me.
If Cain is avenged seven times,
then Lamech seventy-seven times.”
Genesis 4:23-24 (NIV)

Wrath

But on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.
Genesis 4:5 (NIV)

It is ok to be angry. It’s ok to be “VERY angry.”

But the word here is a kindled fire. It is wrath that points to vengeance and destruction… only we are not wise enough to know how to apply it rightly, so it burns out of control.

This wrath is reserved for God, who is the only one who can wield it correctly.

Motherhood and the First Born

You’re not supposed to hate Cain in the story. You’re supposed to look at him through the eyes of a grieving mother who believed that he was the answer to all her problems.

You can relate to Eve, because we’ve all put our trust in something and had it fall apart on us, and perhaps you can relate to Cain, who was under a lot of pressure from his mother.

Adam’s Role

In the Bible, the father is normally the person listed as naming the children, but it’s Eve who names both Cain and Abel in Genesis 3. Adam isn’t involved.

Eve names Seth, but in Genesis 5, the text says Adam does, so the implication may be that they both did. And perhaps that’s the point. We are meant to work together.

More Separations

Genesis 1-3 gives us separations: Heaven/Earth, Waters above/below, Land/Water, Birds/Fish, Animals/Humans, Man/Woman, 2 Trees, Good/Evil, Humanity/Eden, etc., etc.

Genesis 4 does the same, but in an entirely new way. But we are given clues throughout the narrative.

We are shown two brothers: Cain/Abel. Two sacrifices: works/faith.

In Cain’s line, we have Lamech who has two wives. Adah has two sons: Jabal and Jubal. Zillah has two children: Tubal-Cain and Na’amah.

It’s like we are being shown a river that has split into two streams. Paths.

Interestingly, we also are introduced to words that have TWO meanings that are often opposites of one another.

SIN and SIN-OFFERING

Mehujael means both “ALIVE in God” and “KILLED by God”

And then the chapter ends with an EXTREMELY strange word: halel.

Seth also had a son, and he named him Enosh.

At that time people began to call on the name of the Lord.
Genesis 4:26 (NIV)

Most of our bibles end Genesis 4 with this sentence:

“At that time men began to CALL upon the name of the Lord.” (implying worship)

But some render it this way:

“At that time men began to PROFANE the name of the Lord.” (implying the OPPOSITE of worship)

If you look at the concordance for this word, it’s very odd. Most meanings of this word basically equate to blaspheme, or piercing/wounding (interesting), or (oddly) playing the flute.

But also “to begin.”

1. to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin
2. to wound (fatally), bore through, pierce, bore
3. to play the flute or pipe
H2490: חָלַל (ḥālal)

So translators tried to use context to figure this out.

The problem is that context does not help. It can either mean that people began to worship, or began to take God’s name in vain…

or… both?

I believe some of these words are actually intended to be seen BOTH ways; how you read it depends on what God is showing you.

Consider the central message of the sacrifice God found unacceptable: the fruits of Cain’s labor from the ground is cursed (Genesis 3). His best efforts. His accomplishments. His works.

And God says “I don’t want your works.”

Depending on who you are, this has two meanings.

If you are rooted in works, doing everything to EARN God’s favor, you’ll die trying. God won’t accept it. The words kill you.

If you are seeking God’s heart, you’ll know God is telling you that it’s not the works, but your very heart He desires. The words give you life.

So in Genesis 4, we see God separate something again, this time splitting our works from God’s work, and we also get a glimpse into what the consequence of works vs faith does with this character’s name Mehujael, which can mean “alive in God” or “killed by God.”

So at the end, when the text says that “men began to [something] the name of the Lord,” I suspect that it’s both. Some called out, pleading to God. Some profaned the name of God.

In some ways, that’s our own souls, isn’t it? We do both. We, too, ascribe God to our works.

But Genesis 4 is also about choices after our sin. In Gen 3, we hid and covered ourselves in fig leaves. In Genesis 4, we either lean into God, or try to cover our shame with our works. We live this choice.

But God accepts only one of them. He will not accept the other.

Trust after a Broken Heart

I’m not a mother, but I try to imagine the depth of hurt, ache, and the mixing of hope & hopelessness bound up in the birth of Seth.

Eve knows God will redeem the world through her children, but one is lost by murdering the other. All of her hope is destroyed.

She holds Seth.

How she must have trembled at his first cry. How she must have clung to him and pressed him close to her body, but also feared losing him, just like she lost the others.

Could she trust God with this child? She trusted him with the first two, and we know what happened.

I weep for Eve. For us.

How do we trust after we’ve been let down? How do we hope when everything we hoped for has been dashed?

The story of Eve and Seth is a story of God healing the broken hearted. It will require time. It will require God.

What’s in a Genealogy?

Genesis 4 introduces us to Genealogies: a list of names of generations. In English, they are merely names, but the Torah hides meaning inside words. Perhaps God is not giving us names to forget, but parables to understand.

What I’m going to share next is only conjecture.

This is the list: Cain, Enoch, Irad, Mehujael, Methushael, Lamech, Adah, Zillah, Jabel, Jubal, Tubal-Cain, Na’amah.

Each name is a Hebrew word that carries multiple meanings. If you translate each, you can end up with nonsense, but you can also end up with a message of hope.

If I follow the meaning as below, I get this message:

Our ACQUISITIONS and works TEACH us that we’ll WANDER and be STRUCK DOWN. But there’s hope: LIFE. If we SEEK GOD, there is STRENGTH, BEAUTY & PROTECTION, and a FLOW of MUSIC AND JOY.

CAIN’S OFFSPRING can find GRACE.

Again, this is conjecture. I have no idea if this is the intended message, or if I’m merely seeing hope everywhere in the text.

But shouldn’t we? Isn’t that the point? Shouldn’t we hear the echo of the God of Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 ringing loudly and clearly throughout the text?

Neither Cain nor Abel

We always call it the story of “Cain & Abel,” but this ignores a critical part of the story.

Eve assumes God will use Cain – she says as much when she first speaks. And we, seeing Abel’s sacrifice, assume God will use the younger son to fulfill the blessing of “be fruitful and multiply.” But our assumptions are dashed by murder. Cain leaves the scene, and Abel dies. What will God do to solve this problem?

Perhaps the right name of the story should be “Not Cain, not Abel, but through Seth.”

Seth’s name means “appointed.” As in, selected by God to be used for a specific purpose. God’s purpose.

This is the nature of things.

What’s in a Name?

Perhaps there is a story in the name and lives of the sons of Adam and Eve:

Cain means acquired
Abel means a breath; vanity
Seth means appointed

“By the work of my hands, I attempt to acquire a name for myself. But this, too, is vanity, a grasping for the wind.
But God appoints another way. God’s way.